ΣΟΦΙΣΤΗΣ
H.N. Fowler (Loeb, 1921)
Plato · H.N. Fowler (Loeb, 1921)
Also present: SOCRATES THE YOUNGER (silent)
Scene: continuation of the Theaetetus, the day after that conversation
In hunting a definition of the sophist, Plato is led into deep metaphysics: to say that the sophist deals in falsehood and images, he must show how non-being can in some way be. This requires him to commit a kind of 'parricide' against Parmenides, who had forbidden any talk of what-is-not — arguing instead that not-being is simply difference, otherness woven through all things.
The dialogue also stages the 'battle of gods and giants' over being itself, and refines the method of division by which the philosopher carves reality at its joints.
From the Plato Scroll Encyclopedia · open this entry in the reader
Theo: According to our yesterday’s agreement, Socrates, we have come ourselves, as we were bound to do, and we bring also this man with us; he is a stranger from Elea, one of the followers of Parmenides and Zeno, and a real philosopher.
Soc: Are you not unwittingly bringing, as Homer says, some god, and no mere stranger, Theodorus? He says that the gods, and especially the god of strangers, enter into companionship with men who have a share of due reverence and that they behold the deeds, both violent and righteous, of mankind. So perhaps this companion of yours may be one of the higher powers, who comes to watch over and refute us because we are worthless in argument—a kind of god of refutation.
Theo: No, Socrates, that is not the stranger’s character; he is more reasonable than those who devote themselves to disputation. And though I do not think he is a god at all, I certainly do think he is divine, for I give that epithet to all philosophers.
Soc: And rightly, my friend. However, I fancy it is not much easier, if I may say so, to recognize this class, than that of the gods. For these men—I mean those who are not feignedly but really philosophers—appear disguised in all sorts of shapes, thanks to the ignorance of the rest of mankind, and visit the cities, beholding from above the life of those below, and they seem to some to be of no worth and to others to be worth everything. And sometimes they appear disguised as statesmen and sometimes as sophists, and sometimes they may give some people the impression that they are altogether mad. But I should like to ask our stranger here, if agreeable to him, what people in his country thought about these matters, and what names they used.
Theo: What matters do you mean?
Soc: Sophist, statesman, philosopher.
Theo: What particular difficulty and what kind of difficulty in regard to them is it about which you had in mind to ask?
Soc: It is this: Did they consider all these one, or two, or, as there are three names, did they divide them into three classes and ascribe to each a class, corresponding to a single name?
Theo: I think he has no objection to talking about them. What do you say, stranger?
Str: Just what you did, Theodorus; for I have no objection, and it is not difficult to say that they considered them three. But it is no small or easy task to define clearly the nature of each.
Continue reading in Plato Scroll →
The Athenian who turned Socratic conversation into a written philosophy and founded the Academy.
Plato was born around 428 BCE into a wealthy and politically prominent Athenian family; through his mother Perictione the family traced kinship to the lawgiver Solon, and his relatives Critias and Charmides were among the oligarchs of the Thirty. A late tradition says his given name was Aristocles and that 'Plato' — from the word for 'broad' — was a nickname. He grew up during the long agony of the Peloponnesian War and came of age amid the violence and disillusion that followed Athens' defeat.
Plato · H.N. Fowler (Loeb, 1921). Each edition has its page, the reader and a plain-text file: